7:34 - variety of definitions of spirituality
7:56 - the contemplative tradition doesn't accept dogma, it accepts an individual's experience
9:09 - God the father, God the son and God the Holy Spirit is 1st, 2nd and 3rd person in the contemplative Christian tradition
10:16 - mysticism is a technology of interior development
13:55 - monotheistic traditions fight state and structure growth
22:06 - science was open to experimental / contemplative religion
Tuesday, April 14, 2009
Saturday, April 11, 2009
The Conveyor Belt (Apr 14 2007) part 3
3:46 - compassion is wishing to remove others' suffering; love is wishing to positively embrace them
Friday, April 10, 2009
The Conveyor Belt (Apr 14 2007) part 2
3:29 - second tier seems to naturally acquire a spiritual awareness, a spirituality of consciousness, compassion, transcendence, timeless truths, etc.
20:08 - the knowledge quest proceeds funeral by funeral
39:04 - significant, large-scale change needs to come from the top down
51:44 - good definition of first tier: the levels that think that their truths are the only truths; second tier: the levels that see that all truths are valuable
53:22 - states are exclusionary and structures are inclusionary
53:35 - the transpersonal structures start making states permanently available
20:08 - the knowledge quest proceeds funeral by funeral
39:04 - significant, large-scale change needs to come from the top down
51:44 - good definition of first tier: the levels that think that their truths are the only truths; second tier: the levels that see that all truths are valuable
53:22 - states are exclusionary and structures are inclusionary
53:35 - the transpersonal structures start making states permanently available
Thursday, April 9, 2009
The Conveyor Belt (Apr 14 2007) part 1
6:59 - it's common for people who have moved on from traditional, mythic religion to still find depth and meaning from it
8:30 - prerational spirituality is a concrete, mythic form, transrational spirituality is an interior, contemplative form
9:15 - Buddhism does not cover transrational structures of development; it covers nonrational lateral states
15:34 - recognition of your primordial nature is effortless, but then you have to manifest it in the relative world
15:41 - if you want to bring anything into manifestation, including the dharma, effort and achievement is required
18:35 - The Secret, again, The Secret; oy vey
18:44 - a better understanding of quantum mechanics is needed here
19:04 - consciousness does not collapse the wave function; stop saying that it does
31:12 - satori doesn't tell you anything about the content of the manifest world
33:31 - Big Mind is a progressive disidentification with subpersonalities
8:30 - prerational spirituality is a concrete, mythic form, transrational spirituality is an interior, contemplative form
9:15 - Buddhism does not cover transrational structures of development; it covers nonrational lateral states
15:34 - recognition of your primordial nature is effortless, but then you have to manifest it in the relative world
15:41 - if you want to bring anything into manifestation, including the dharma, effort and achievement is required
18:35 - The Secret, again, The Secret; oy vey
18:44 - a better understanding of quantum mechanics is needed here
19:04 - consciousness does not collapse the wave function; stop saying that it does
31:12 - satori doesn't tell you anything about the content of the manifest world
33:31 - Big Mind is a progressive disidentification with subpersonalities
Wednesday, April 8, 2009
The World of the Terribly Obvious (Mar 31 2007) part 5
0:03 - an individual at a level tries to understand other levels, but holds that understanding at the space they are at
1:11 - this has been a major tripping point for the whole mythopoetic movement: the pre-trans fallacy rears its head again
1:24 - Joseph Campbell: when myths are taken as literal, that perverts the meaning of the myth
1:46 - Campbell is attempting to make prerational myths carry transrational truths: a classic pre - trans fallacy mistake
3:03 - Campbell is saying that only myths held in a rational space are real
5:31 - few myths are generated at a transrational level
7:53 - only at second tier does perspective become expansive enough to allow for hermeneutics
14:51 - Krishnamurti didn't recognize relative levels of development
16:47 - you can't see structures - they're not in given awareness
17:19 - the individual subject is used by the structure
18:14 - but deconstruction of the self is not the same as the Buddhist no-self
18:32 - structures are intersubjective systems - a nexus agency
21:46 - the postmodern exploration of phenomena has divorced itself from state training
30:33 - each transpersonal structure transcends and includes the previous states; as you go through the higher structures the previous states become permanently available
32:05 - the more you can attain deeper transpersonal states, the more freedom and creativity you have in shifting your awareness
33:15 - traditional levels of the subtle body: the etheric, the astral, the mental, the psychic
39:44 - green is susceptible to pre-modern myths and other aspects of the pre-rational world (the eco-primitive purism, "yesterday was one with source", etc.)
40:44 - green is also susceptible to the anti-rationality of the boomers (just trust your feelings, don't think, etc.)
40:44 - feelings can't take the role of other (which is kind of important)
46:21 - art connects with an audience when some part of it resonates at their altitude
50:23 - an artefact is something made by a sentient holon whose agency or form is imprinted on it
1:00:15 - reality is not only physical, it is psychophysical -Adi Da
1:00:32 - but don't take that to mean that we are creating phenomena (e.g. The Secret)
1:00:44 - what it means is we are co-creating our experience of phenomena, and we can shift our world by shifting our perception
1:04:25 - The Witness, no-mind, is absolute subjectivity
1:04:33 - that doesn't mean it's a subject - it's nondual, neither subject nor object
1:04:39 - what it means is that it lies in the direction of subjectivity (I Am-ness)
1:04:45 - when you objectify everything and enter absolute subjectivity, then you hit the nondual
1:04:51 - in absolute subjectivity all subjects and objects are arising within it
1:07:00 - The Witness is usually looking through a relative I
1:07:11 - but the feeling of The Witness is not there - it is vast emptiness
1:07:17 - The Witness is that which you can't see or feel
1:07:32 - who am I?
1:15:15 - there can be an art, morals and science in all four quadrants
1:17:27 - in modernity, the it domain (science) took over the I and the we domains; that's a problem
1:17:39 - but don't make a worse mistake by then condemning all of modernity
1:11 - this has been a major tripping point for the whole mythopoetic movement: the pre-trans fallacy rears its head again
1:24 - Joseph Campbell: when myths are taken as literal, that perverts the meaning of the myth
1:46 - Campbell is attempting to make prerational myths carry transrational truths: a classic pre - trans fallacy mistake
3:03 - Campbell is saying that only myths held in a rational space are real
5:31 - few myths are generated at a transrational level
7:53 - only at second tier does perspective become expansive enough to allow for hermeneutics
14:51 - Krishnamurti didn't recognize relative levels of development
16:47 - you can't see structures - they're not in given awareness
17:19 - the individual subject is used by the structure
18:14 - but deconstruction of the self is not the same as the Buddhist no-self
18:32 - structures are intersubjective systems - a nexus agency
21:46 - the postmodern exploration of phenomena has divorced itself from state training
30:33 - each transpersonal structure transcends and includes the previous states; as you go through the higher structures the previous states become permanently available
32:05 - the more you can attain deeper transpersonal states, the more freedom and creativity you have in shifting your awareness
33:15 - traditional levels of the subtle body: the etheric, the astral, the mental, the psychic
39:44 - green is susceptible to pre-modern myths and other aspects of the pre-rational world (the eco-primitive purism, "yesterday was one with source", etc.)
40:44 - green is also susceptible to the anti-rationality of the boomers (just trust your feelings, don't think, etc.)
40:44 - feelings can't take the role of other (which is kind of important)
46:21 - art connects with an audience when some part of it resonates at their altitude
50:23 - an artefact is something made by a sentient holon whose agency or form is imprinted on it
1:00:15 - reality is not only physical, it is psychophysical -Adi Da
1:00:32 - but don't take that to mean that we are creating phenomena (e.g. The Secret)
1:00:44 - what it means is we are co-creating our experience of phenomena, and we can shift our world by shifting our perception
1:04:25 - The Witness, no-mind, is absolute subjectivity
1:04:33 - that doesn't mean it's a subject - it's nondual, neither subject nor object
1:04:39 - what it means is that it lies in the direction of subjectivity (I Am-ness)
1:04:45 - when you objectify everything and enter absolute subjectivity, then you hit the nondual
1:04:51 - in absolute subjectivity all subjects and objects are arising within it
1:07:00 - The Witness is usually looking through a relative I
1:07:11 - but the feeling of The Witness is not there - it is vast emptiness
1:07:17 - The Witness is that which you can't see or feel
1:07:32 - who am I?
1:15:15 - there can be an art, morals and science in all four quadrants
1:17:27 - in modernity, the it domain (science) took over the I and the we domains; that's a problem
1:17:39 - but don't make a worse mistake by then condemning all of modernity
Monday, April 6, 2009
The World of the Terribly Obvious (Mar 31 2007) part 4
0:50 - just being aware of transpersonal structures helps our working with transpersonal states
1:06 - that alone can increase our depth and our height
2:26 - an understanding of all four quadrants can help any one quadrant evolve
3:04 - you don't see the level you're at
6:00 - that's why having a map is important; it helps you see subject as object, helping you transcend
10:08 - there's a dialectical process between agency and communion and Eros and Agape
10:37 - agency is the drive to be a whole, to maintain integrity, autonomy and freedom
10:45 - communion is the drive to be a part of a larger culture
11:37 - Eros is the drive upward, to let go of objects and negate the lower
12:02 - Agape is the drive to identify, feel into awareness, reaching down to embrace lower levels
13:03 - it's healthy to alternate between all of these
14:31 - it's possible to be at a nondual state and have let go of all objects in your awareness
14:41 - but that's the trick; your awareness is still at a particular level, and thus all that's in your awareness are the objects below that level
21:35 - structures are referred to as higher or lower, states are referred to as deeper or shallower
21:44 - when the we space is at a specific altitude, it will exert a pull on your I space
22:48 - more than a help, the we space is essential for growth and transformation
23:00 - the I, it and we are Buddha, Dharma, Sangha
27:19 - how do you reach all levels of development on their own terms?
30:14 - zen thinks you can look within and see your true self - the myth of the given
30:55 - the relative, finite self is ultimately false, when compared to the absolute self - but you can get that false self wrong
31:42 - inside the relative realm, there's a true and false
32:55 - we work to get the relative world right
33:23 - Marx was looking at unfreedom in the social realm; Freud was looking at unfreedom in the personal realm
33:41 - when we say the shadow is producing a false self, a self that is not the true self, that true self we are talking about is not the absolute Self, we are talking about the relative true self
34:20 - there are two forms of falseness, relative falseness and ultimate falseness
34:29 - two goals: the relative goal is to make the four quadrants as healthy as we can; the absolute goal is to drop them
41:44 - history is a chronicle of men and women born too soon
42:33 - let's get one thing straight: we are not on the verge of a global outbreak of consciousness expansion that is going to liberate everybody
46:32 - green looks at teal and thinks it's seeing red
54:45 - the various dimensions of existence, body, mind, soul, spirit, are held in consciousness in ways particular to each level
58:04 - contemplatives, when they describe stages / levels, are almost always describing state-stages
58:48 - the world coemerges differently based on the structure of consciousness
1:06 - that alone can increase our depth and our height
2:26 - an understanding of all four quadrants can help any one quadrant evolve
3:04 - you don't see the level you're at
6:00 - that's why having a map is important; it helps you see subject as object, helping you transcend
10:08 - there's a dialectical process between agency and communion and Eros and Agape
10:37 - agency is the drive to be a whole, to maintain integrity, autonomy and freedom
10:45 - communion is the drive to be a part of a larger culture
11:37 - Eros is the drive upward, to let go of objects and negate the lower
12:02 - Agape is the drive to identify, feel into awareness, reaching down to embrace lower levels
13:03 - it's healthy to alternate between all of these
14:31 - it's possible to be at a nondual state and have let go of all objects in your awareness
14:41 - but that's the trick; your awareness is still at a particular level, and thus all that's in your awareness are the objects below that level
21:35 - structures are referred to as higher or lower, states are referred to as deeper or shallower
21:44 - when the we space is at a specific altitude, it will exert a pull on your I space
22:48 - more than a help, the we space is essential for growth and transformation
23:00 - the I, it and we are Buddha, Dharma, Sangha
27:19 - how do you reach all levels of development on their own terms?
30:14 - zen thinks you can look within and see your true self - the myth of the given
30:55 - the relative, finite self is ultimately false, when compared to the absolute self - but you can get that false self wrong
31:42 - inside the relative realm, there's a true and false
32:55 - we work to get the relative world right
33:23 - Marx was looking at unfreedom in the social realm; Freud was looking at unfreedom in the personal realm
33:41 - when we say the shadow is producing a false self, a self that is not the true self, that true self we are talking about is not the absolute Self, we are talking about the relative true self
34:20 - there are two forms of falseness, relative falseness and ultimate falseness
34:29 - two goals: the relative goal is to make the four quadrants as healthy as we can; the absolute goal is to drop them
41:44 - history is a chronicle of men and women born too soon
42:33 - let's get one thing straight: we are not on the verge of a global outbreak of consciousness expansion that is going to liberate everybody
46:32 - green looks at teal and thinks it's seeing red
54:45 - the various dimensions of existence, body, mind, soul, spirit, are held in consciousness in ways particular to each level
58:04 - contemplatives, when they describe stages / levels, are almost always describing state-stages
58:48 - the world coemerges differently based on the structure of consciousness
Sunday, April 5, 2009
The World of the Terribly Obvious (Mar 31 2007) part 3
2:22 - placing your separate self at the center of the kosmos, rather than placing the kosmos at the center of your separate self
3:44 - lower holons determine the possibilities of the higher; the higher determines the probabilities of the lower
11:20 - delusions of reference; the delusion that something happening in the exterior world is there for a special reason just for me
11:53 - examples: six-month-olds, paranoid schizophrenics, purple / magenta magic, The Secret / Law of Attraction
12:20 - the magic level of consciousness has it that wholes with similar parts are equated
13:00 - also it confuses whole and part
14:21 - green was trying to transcend distancing, monolithic orange thinking, and made two mistakes
15:09 - it confused transrational feelings with prerational sensations
16:18 - and it confused synchronicity with nondual holism
18:43 - when you drop your everyday, ordinary awareness / consciousness / sense of self, whatever structure / level attempting to emerge is all that is left
22:22 - when the next phase of growth is about to occur, it may be triggered by an event that wouldn't have been noticed earlier
29:53 - quantum mechanics does not cause the higher levels - pranamayakosha causes quantum mechanics
30:14 - quantum mechanics has nothing to do with spirituality, other than it is a manifestation of spirit like everything else
32:08 - all this is Eros
51:44 - the question of freedom is how do we transcend; the question of fullness is how do we embrace
51:58 - the answer to the first question is the subject of one level becomes the object of the subject of the next level
51:34 - development through states is important (meditation)
51:37 - but you also want to have the states contribute to the growth into structures of consciousness
51:45 - you need both
52:48 - you can go through all transpersonal states and become further cemented in the dogma of your surrounding culture
53:57 - intellectual, conscious awareness of the structures does help you move through them
54:12 - without a good map of horizontal state-stages and vertical structure-stages, meditation can often keep you just on the horizontal path (through the transpersonal states)
54:37 - let's get some terminology for the differently-state-centered types of self-sense down
54:47 - a self-sense oriented at gross state is ego
54:58 - a self-sense oriented at soul / subtle state is soul
55:01 - a self-sense oriented at causal is Self
55:06 - a self-sense oriented at nondual is suchness
55:26 - meditation moves you through these states
55:48 - states are exclusive
56:23 - good definition of structure: a pattern of wholeness
56:57 - evolution is the process of states transforming into structures
57:12 - there are potentially many different structures possible
57:39 - having a peak experience can help you advance through the structures
58:14 - the contents of enlightenment can change as time passes
58:24 - an enlightened shaman at 4,000 BC is red - because that's all that was available at the time
59:18 - Gautama Buddha: orange structure, causal state
3:44 - lower holons determine the possibilities of the higher; the higher determines the probabilities of the lower
11:20 - delusions of reference; the delusion that something happening in the exterior world is there for a special reason just for me
11:53 - examples: six-month-olds, paranoid schizophrenics, purple / magenta magic, The Secret / Law of Attraction
12:20 - the magic level of consciousness has it that wholes with similar parts are equated
13:00 - also it confuses whole and part
14:21 - green was trying to transcend distancing, monolithic orange thinking, and made two mistakes
15:09 - it confused transrational feelings with prerational sensations
16:18 - and it confused synchronicity with nondual holism
18:43 - when you drop your everyday, ordinary awareness / consciousness / sense of self, whatever structure / level attempting to emerge is all that is left
22:22 - when the next phase of growth is about to occur, it may be triggered by an event that wouldn't have been noticed earlier
29:53 - quantum mechanics does not cause the higher levels - pranamayakosha causes quantum mechanics
30:14 - quantum mechanics has nothing to do with spirituality, other than it is a manifestation of spirit like everything else
32:08 - all this is Eros
51:44 - the question of freedom is how do we transcend; the question of fullness is how do we embrace
51:58 - the answer to the first question is the subject of one level becomes the object of the subject of the next level
51:34 - development through states is important (meditation)
51:37 - but you also want to have the states contribute to the growth into structures of consciousness
51:45 - you need both
52:48 - you can go through all transpersonal states and become further cemented in the dogma of your surrounding culture
53:57 - intellectual, conscious awareness of the structures does help you move through them
54:12 - without a good map of horizontal state-stages and vertical structure-stages, meditation can often keep you just on the horizontal path (through the transpersonal states)
54:37 - let's get some terminology for the differently-state-centered types of self-sense down
54:47 - a self-sense oriented at gross state is ego
54:58 - a self-sense oriented at soul / subtle state is soul
55:01 - a self-sense oriented at causal is Self
55:06 - a self-sense oriented at nondual is suchness
55:26 - meditation moves you through these states
55:48 - states are exclusive
56:23 - good definition of structure: a pattern of wholeness
56:57 - evolution is the process of states transforming into structures
57:12 - there are potentially many different structures possible
57:39 - having a peak experience can help you advance through the structures
58:14 - the contents of enlightenment can change as time passes
58:24 - an enlightened shaman at 4,000 BC is red - because that's all that was available at the time
59:18 - Gautama Buddha: orange structure, causal state
Saturday, April 4, 2009
The World of the Terribly Obvious (Mar 31 2007) part 2
6:56 - you can have a state of consciousness when the structure of consciousness is not yet ready to hold it
8:04 - higher states and higher structures can presage themselves; tragically, contemporary psychiatry interprets this as a breakdown
24:05 - postmodernism gives us some profound insights, along with some bad mistakes
24:25 - the pre-trans fallacy; pre and trans look similar, so tend to get confused
25:01 - which leads to either elevating pre to trans status
25:33 - or reducing trans to pre
41:40 - the myth of the given is that my perceptions of the world are correct, the world is not partially a construction of my consciousness
47:14 - some of what science sees is culturally constructed
47:46 - postmodernism threw out monolithic interiors
48:54 - a quick summary of postmodernism: all structures and states have a lower left quadrant
49:19 - Foucault's archaeology of knowledge focuses on zone four; his genealogy focuses on zone three
55:32 - why the given is a myth: there is no single pre-given world that's universally true for everybody; the given world is different at every stage / level / structure
55:55 - pre-human stages are shared by everyone (interpretations of those stages will be different at different levels, of course)
8:04 - higher states and higher structures can presage themselves; tragically, contemporary psychiatry interprets this as a breakdown
24:05 - postmodernism gives us some profound insights, along with some bad mistakes
24:25 - the pre-trans fallacy; pre and trans look similar, so tend to get confused
25:01 - which leads to either elevating pre to trans status
25:33 - or reducing trans to pre
41:40 - the myth of the given is that my perceptions of the world are correct, the world is not partially a construction of my consciousness
47:14 - some of what science sees is culturally constructed
47:46 - postmodernism threw out monolithic interiors
48:54 - a quick summary of postmodernism: all structures and states have a lower left quadrant
49:19 - Foucault's archaeology of knowledge focuses on zone four; his genealogy focuses on zone three
55:32 - why the given is a myth: there is no single pre-given world that's universally true for everybody; the given world is different at every stage / level / structure
55:55 - pre-human stages are shared by everyone (interpretations of those stages will be different at different levels, of course)
Friday, April 3, 2009
The World of the Terribly Obvious (Mar 31 2007) part 1
2:10 - intersubjective dialogue is important in our deepening our spiritual practice
2:13 - we can only hold our own perspective; sometimes it takes an outside perspective to clearly see what's happening
7:20 - Idealism means setting the bar above where you currently are, with some assurance that you can reach it
16:00 - zones three and four: cultural anthropology is looking at the lower left from the outside (objective), hermeneutics is interpreting the lower left from the inside (subjective)
17:37 - pluralism starts with an important insight: all cultures are different and cannot be bound by any universal principles
17:54 - but that insight quickly slides into relativism: no truth is better than another, there is no objective truth, etc.
18:03 - and that of course leads us to the performative contradiction: you're asserting that there are no universal truths applicable to all cultures, and that truth is universally applicable to all cultures
18:20 - green wants us to believe that it is freeing all viewpoints: it isn't
24:22 - second tier has nested hierarchies, not monolithic hierarchies, hierarchies of internal growth, not of external oppression
24:40 - all growth hierarchies are non-oppressive
24:45 - oppression is a pathology within the actualization or growth holarchy
26:08 - the paradigm of the pre-post fallacy: they (green, usually) understand the problems with modernity, but they romanticize pre-modernity
2:13 - we can only hold our own perspective; sometimes it takes an outside perspective to clearly see what's happening
7:20 - Idealism means setting the bar above where you currently are, with some assurance that you can reach it
16:00 - zones three and four: cultural anthropology is looking at the lower left from the outside (objective), hermeneutics is interpreting the lower left from the inside (subjective)
17:37 - pluralism starts with an important insight: all cultures are different and cannot be bound by any universal principles
17:54 - but that insight quickly slides into relativism: no truth is better than another, there is no objective truth, etc.
18:03 - and that of course leads us to the performative contradiction: you're asserting that there are no universal truths applicable to all cultures, and that truth is universally applicable to all cultures
18:20 - green wants us to believe that it is freeing all viewpoints: it isn't
24:22 - second tier has nested hierarchies, not monolithic hierarchies, hierarchies of internal growth, not of external oppression
24:40 - all growth hierarchies are non-oppressive
24:45 - oppression is a pathology within the actualization or growth holarchy
26:08 - the paradigm of the pre-post fallacy: they (green, usually) understand the problems with modernity, but they romanticize pre-modernity
Thursday, April 2, 2009
A Miracle Called We (Mar 11 2007) part 5
0:12 - taking a second person perspective is to move from egocentric to ethnocentric
0:19 - there is third person awareness, but not a third-person perspective
0:32 - which come with formal operational cognition / orange / adolescence
0:54 - the quadrants are always present, but they're not self-reflexively aware (until a certain stage of development)
10:21 - an eight-year-old may be in a hermeneutic space, but that doesn't mean they can do hermeneutics
16:22 - there's no freedom involved
17:34 - quadrant absolutism is denying things in other quadrants
17:51 - freedom is in zone one
19:07 - our freedom is not as clear-cut as we would like to think
20:41 - but let us not eliminate freedom entirely
21:01 - if freedom is to some extent defined as indeterminacy, there is some in every holon
23:00 - how is it great meditators did not advance through the stages / structures / levels?
24:22 - they didn't because conditions have to be right in all four quadrants
24:54 - meditation is a help, but is not a cause (of growth)
24:59 - it's possible meditation can reinforce a level
25:24 - a state of consciousness will be interpreted by the structure of consciousness that holds it
25:33 - if you are in an environment that encourages freedom, growth and exploration, meditation will increase the likelihood of advancement (but not be the cause)
26:13 - in an ethnocentric, traditional environment, higher states will be interpreted according to the dogma
27:20 - all of which goes to show once again that structures of consciousness and states of consciousness are independent
28:17 - if you are inside an amber / blue / mythic membership culture and meditate, you won't attain higher structure; higher structures don't exist in that culture
28:30 - meditation fundamentally encourages horizontal movement through states of consciousness
28:57 - meditation can exert a micro-transformative vertical pressure (if the quadrants are not directly opposing it), but the results are spotty
34:40 - a good theory is a theory that can last long enough to get you to a better one
36:00 - there are 8 fundamental methodologies - use them
36:25 - traditional Zen teaching tells you to just drop everything, which is really pretty unhelpful
37:21 - in Buddhism, there is a relative truth and an absolute truth
37:33 - in the absolute realm, there is no qualities, no division, all is eternal, timeless emptiness
37:53 - in the relative, manifest realm, we have politics, society, environment, psychology, health, etc.
38:03 - saying "just drop all that" is outright unethical - http://www.mro.org/zmm/teachings/daido/teisho57.php
38:14 - yes, it's all a dream, it's all an illusion, maya, to be dropped, okay, cool, we got it
38:21 - once you achieve that awareness, you have to integrate emptiness and form
38:27 - easing relative suffering is an ethical demand; the relative world of form requires scientists, educators, politicians who can work toward this
38:43 - sitting and achieving nondual awareness is an individual achievement; it gets you off the wheel, but helps no one else
39:25 - there are currently popular teachers of the nondual path; Byron Katie, Eckhart Tolle, etc.
39:52 - but where they're lacking is in the integration of emptiness and form
40:25 - we need to get people well-rounded and awakened; not just awakened
40:57 - the Lankavatara Sutra integrates emptiness and the manifestation of the world of form into a complete holarchy
0:19 - there is third person awareness, but not a third-person perspective
0:32 - which come with formal operational cognition / orange / adolescence
0:54 - the quadrants are always present, but they're not self-reflexively aware (until a certain stage of development)
10:21 - an eight-year-old may be in a hermeneutic space, but that doesn't mean they can do hermeneutics
16:22 - there's no freedom involved
17:34 - quadrant absolutism is denying things in other quadrants
17:51 - freedom is in zone one
19:07 - our freedom is not as clear-cut as we would like to think
20:41 - but let us not eliminate freedom entirely
21:01 - if freedom is to some extent defined as indeterminacy, there is some in every holon
23:00 - how is it great meditators did not advance through the stages / structures / levels?
24:22 - they didn't because conditions have to be right in all four quadrants
24:54 - meditation is a help, but is not a cause (of growth)
24:59 - it's possible meditation can reinforce a level
25:24 - a state of consciousness will be interpreted by the structure of consciousness that holds it
25:33 - if you are in an environment that encourages freedom, growth and exploration, meditation will increase the likelihood of advancement (but not be the cause)
26:13 - in an ethnocentric, traditional environment, higher states will be interpreted according to the dogma
27:20 - all of which goes to show once again that structures of consciousness and states of consciousness are independent
28:17 - if you are inside an amber / blue / mythic membership culture and meditate, you won't attain higher structure; higher structures don't exist in that culture
28:30 - meditation fundamentally encourages horizontal movement through states of consciousness
28:57 - meditation can exert a micro-transformative vertical pressure (if the quadrants are not directly opposing it), but the results are spotty
34:40 - a good theory is a theory that can last long enough to get you to a better one
36:00 - there are 8 fundamental methodologies - use them
36:25 - traditional Zen teaching tells you to just drop everything, which is really pretty unhelpful
37:21 - in Buddhism, there is a relative truth and an absolute truth
37:33 - in the absolute realm, there is no qualities, no division, all is eternal, timeless emptiness
37:53 - in the relative, manifest realm, we have politics, society, environment, psychology, health, etc.
38:03 - saying "just drop all that" is outright unethical - http://www.mro.org/zmm/teachings/daido/teisho57.php
38:14 - yes, it's all a dream, it's all an illusion, maya, to be dropped, okay, cool, we got it
38:21 - once you achieve that awareness, you have to integrate emptiness and form
38:27 - easing relative suffering is an ethical demand; the relative world of form requires scientists, educators, politicians who can work toward this
38:43 - sitting and achieving nondual awareness is an individual achievement; it gets you off the wheel, but helps no one else
39:25 - there are currently popular teachers of the nondual path; Byron Katie, Eckhart Tolle, etc.
39:52 - but where they're lacking is in the integration of emptiness and form
40:25 - we need to get people well-rounded and awakened; not just awakened
40:57 - the Lankavatara Sutra integrates emptiness and the manifestation of the world of form into a complete holarchy
Wednesday, April 1, 2009
A Miracle Called We (Mar 11 2007) part 4
3:27 - is the student-guru relationship one of I-thou? does this get confused with a second-person relationship with God?
3:34 - yeah, pretty much
3:38 - in the ideal, theoretical student-guru relationship, the relationship models the relationship to God in the second person by seeing the guru as spirit incarnate
3:55 - thus helping students find their own spirit in first person (because eventually you identify with the guru)
4:08 - note that it almost never works out this way
6:09 - it doesn't seem like groups have stages, exactly
13:22 - how do you move a dominant mode of resonance up?
24:13 - mature monogamy: the other person is a partner in awakening (Robert Masters' work)
35:26 - skillful means: how do we communicate 2nd tier concepts to 1st tier?
36:39 - first, know the audience: one on one or a group or an informal gathering, etc.
36:55 - translate 2nd tier ideas into 1st tier versions
55:49 - self-awareness is not present at all levels
58:54 - first person perspective develops at age three to five, egocentric
3:34 - yeah, pretty much
3:38 - in the ideal, theoretical student-guru relationship, the relationship models the relationship to God in the second person by seeing the guru as spirit incarnate
3:55 - thus helping students find their own spirit in first person (because eventually you identify with the guru)
4:08 - note that it almost never works out this way
6:09 - it doesn't seem like groups have stages, exactly
13:22 - how do you move a dominant mode of resonance up?
24:13 - mature monogamy: the other person is a partner in awakening (Robert Masters' work)
35:26 - skillful means: how do we communicate 2nd tier concepts to 1st tier?
36:39 - first, know the audience: one on one or a group or an informal gathering, etc.
36:55 - translate 2nd tier ideas into 1st tier versions
55:49 - self-awareness is not present at all levels
58:54 - first person perspective develops at age three to five, egocentric
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)